Tuesday, May 23, 2017

Steven Crowder - It's Not Time for Unity, It's Time for An Alliance

As in the Allied powers of WWII.  Steven Crowder takes a break from writing comedy for his channel to do a video on the attack in Manchester last night . 

Like most of us, I'm sickened by the murder of innocents in the UK; this time young girls.  Apparently a venue full of girls in the (I've read) 10 to 20 age group was chosen as a way to outrage westerners, because in their minds if some "westerner" goes and kills a random mooslim, that will cause the so-called "moderate" mooslims to endorse Isis and cause the battle for the end of the world they're trying to create.  That it's a sick, twisted view of the world is an understatement.

Crowder wrote an accompanying piece for the Blaze with some highlights.  
If you want to practice Islam in the inconsequential, semi-secular sense. Fine. But the only way to solve this problem is to recognize that POLITICAL Islam and anyone who follows its prescription is inherently incompatible with Western values.

That means:

  • Want sharia courts?  You’re not welcome.
  • Think it’s okay to marry a six year old?  You’re not welcome.
  • Think it’s okay to strike your wife for ANY reason?  You’re not welcome.
  • Believe in ANY kind of punishment for apostasy?  You’re not welcome.
  • Believe in ANY kind of punishment for “blasphemy”?  You’re not welcome.

  • These are the kinds of values that progressives would defend against any radical Christians who believe any of the above. And rightfully so. So why can’t we all agree on these universally? Anyone who holds any of those beliefs is by definition, incompatible with the Western world.

    People are giving President Trump crap for calling them “losers.” Listen, the guy isn’t eloquent, but he’s right. These terrorists fear shame more than death. It’s why Abu Ghraib was such an outrage when American, female soldiers stripped them naked and laughed at them while dogs barked. To them, that is a far greater punishment than death or even torture. If any American received said treatment at the hands of ISIS, we’d thank the Lord above that we weren’t being burnt alive in cages. We don’t merely punish terrorists through death. We punish them through shame.

    At least ONE leader is willing to give it the old college try. So today, I stand with the president of the United States instead of trying to mince words on social media and virtue-signal about how much “unity” we need. We don’t need “unity”. We need an alliance. There’s a difference.
    For as bad as the attack was, Miguel at GunFreeZone posts a twitter capture that may just be worse, at least as a warning sign.
    British journalist Katie Hopkins posts a message that sure lines up with my view.  "Western men.  These are your wives.  Your daughters.  Your sons.  Stand up.  Rise up.  Demand action.  Do not carry on as normal.  Cowed."  For which she's reported to the police for "inciting racial hatred" - hate speech - by SJW DarrenB.

    That is probably worse than the attack itself. The attack was awful, but it’s the deliberate actions of a bunch of evil murderers trying to incite a war.  Evil is as evil does.

    The response, though, is the DarrenB saying “Kill a few more of my daughters. Have you tried raping my wife?  Take over the country and I’ll be your slave.”

    It's the Death of the West in one Twitter exchange. 


    19 comments:

    1. I just do not think it is possible for Islam and the West to live in peace. We are always reminded that it is just the radicals who do this and majority of Muslims are moderate. But the problem(s) with this belief is that moderate Muslims do not support the radicals. The moderate Muslims will tell you when they are asked that they agree that it is OK to kill infidels and all of the world must come under Sharia law. They will give money and aid to radical Islamic organizations knowing that these kinds of attacks will happen. And they are allowed and required under the koran to lie to us and to work to over throw us. How do you live with that. England's and Europe's only choice if they want to survive is to stop all Muslim immigration and to the extent possible to remove/deport the Muslims who live there now. A pretty radical choice I agree. But it is either that or this drip, drip of terror will continue until the Muslims represent a large enough portion of the population to then move to open warfare. This is what they face (us too). I do not think they have the guts to do what they must to survive. If you are in your 40's and 50's you will see a Isllamic Europe in your lifetime. It will by necessity follow a brutal bloody civil war that Islam intends to win. That's it! that is their future.

      ReplyDelete
    2. We need to understand (as Crowder points out) that we tolerate all faith, but political Islam extends out beyond faith and it must not be permitted to exist as we see it today. So long as activist judges can block any law on a whim, nothing will be done. And there we are. Radical Islam understands the ease with which we can be thwarted.

      ReplyDelete
    3. All of this has passed into the realm of internet memes.

      (1) Islam demands minority rights in every country where they're the minority. Where they're the majority, there are NO minority rights.
      (2) Islam will use our tolerance and kindness as a way to get a majority and then eliminate tolerance.

      With the demographic trends of Western countries refusing to breed, Western Civilization will probably end this century. And the next dark ages will descend upon the world.

      ReplyDelete
    4. Catholics support child molesting priests. Episcopals support Weather Underground terrorist bombers, or did. Many voters in colonial countries happily pay taxes knowing it will be used for imperial colonial armies of occupation. Why is Muslims bombing Britain worse than Americans bombing Muslim countries? Is the argument merely, cheer for the home team? Abandon the hundreds of overseas American bases, tell soldiers to pack their toothbrush and get on the plane home, and then you'll have a clear argument that Britain was an attack and not a counterattack.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Anon, are you really this ignorant, or are you simply an apologist for the perversions of islam? No other religion in the world insists on the killing of those who don't believe as they do. The perverts of Catholicism, the individual members of Christian religions or Judaism may commit crimes against other people, including children, but only islam makes it a part of the accepted behavior of all who practice islam.

        Killing in other religions is a bug, not a feature. In islam, killing is a feature, not a bug. There are no "secular" muslims, and there are no "political" muslims. There are only true, orthodox muslims and apostates. Any muslim who (and they are rare) will tell you the truth will tell you that those who do not follow the qur'an exactly as written are apostates, people who have turned away from islam. The qur'an demands the death of any who have known islam but turn away from it, who do not embrace and practice _all_ of it.

        Bad people in other religions are the exception. Bad people in islam are the rule. They will never change, and any who claim to be working to "reform" islam are lying to you. They started out 1400 years ago killing non-believers, raping their child "brides, killing homosexuals (sex with another male is acceptable unless there is a romantic relationship; if so they are commanded to kill the homosexuals involved), taking or buying sex slaves ("war brides"), killing daughters who bring "dishonor" upon the family ("honor killings" of daughters/sisters), having sex with _infants_ (the Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran approved of that), beating and starving wives who do not do everything and anything (including anal sex) commanded by their husbands, sex with animals, and other perversions as well.

        Every one of these perverted behaviors is still approved of - or even commanded by - the qur'an today. The barbaric histories of some of the Christian religons took place many hundreds of years ago. None of those practices are currently part of modern Christianity. islam has refused to cease the perverted behaviors and practices that were begun by mohammed to get large numbers of desert brigands and other scum to join his army, and to justify the perversions he practiced himself (like child rape, killing men to take their wives as sex slaves, etc.) islam refuses to change in any way, and will never change unless it is outlawed.

        Delete
      2. Muslims are a red herring, a distraction from understanding the battle plan. If the American would-be victims of a Muslim spree killer in a gay bar or school could shoot back and not be prosecuted like Zimmerman, they would, and there would be no spree killers. Muslims don't have the votes to impose gun control in America. Only the majority, which is White and middle class, has the votes to impose gun control. They are the actual problem.

        There is plenty of bad behavior by Christians. The Spanish Inquisition. Genocide of American Indians. American colonial occupation armies. Aid and comfort to child molesting priests. Weather Underground terrorist bombers. Muslim violent behavior is not that exotic or unusual.

        Army strength comes from economic strength. The fundamentalist Muslim heavy industrial base is weak, and can't employ Rosie the Riveter. Can you picture them building an invasion fleet like the opening of Saving Private Ryan? No, they are just losers.

        Delete
      3. Keep smoking dope and spewing shit, anon. YOU are the red herring.

        This is a typical leftist/socialist tactic: divert, confuse, conflate. We aren't talking about the Catholic church's transgressions; we aren't talking about the Episcopal church's involvement with radicals. We're talking about Islam, as a political force, and radial terrorism as a political tool. All the shit you mentioned above, the Inquisition, the genocide of Native Americans (a practice they, themselves, participated in prior to European arrival), are all ancient history (how come you didn't throw the Crusades in there? Did you forget about that old saw, Barack?).

        Name ONE mass murder attack perpetrated by Christians in the last 15 years. You can't. All done by mohammedians.

        Find the mosque. Arrest and deport or imprison the imam. Bulldoze the building and fence off the lot. Repeat until this shit stops. Chase the losers away.

        Delete
      4. Name ONE mass murder attack perpetrated by Christians in the last 15 years.

        That would be the last time a wedding in the Middle East has been blown up by a missile from a US military drone. I'm talking about Christianity, as a political force, and radical terrorism as a political tool. Our technology level is much higher because we're not losers, but the moral "what" and "why" and "who" of the attacks isn't any better.

        Delete
      5. Oh, yes. Ms. Anonymous rears its pointed head and brays. So eloquently opines about something with nothing.

        Delete
    5. There is no halfway kinda sortof Islam. Muzzles come in two varieties, the radical one wanting to kill you and the moderate one wanting the radical one to kill you. Any actual muzzle saying they want to coexist peacefully with others is practicing Taqiyya.....they are LYING.

      Islam is not a religion, it is a sociopolitical construct masquerading as a religion in order to achieve the goal set forth in the Koran.....world conquest. There is and can never be peace or coexistence between Islam and any other group, religion, creed or society. It is them or us. Either we exterminate them, quarantine them in their hellish sandbox FOREVER or we ALL DIE UNDER THEIR ASSAULT. There is no other path.

      ReplyDelete
    6. The Catholic church was the first multinational corporation. It too is a protection racket masquerading as a religion, it's just better at world conquest than its competitor desert religions. Today environmentalists and SJW promote the same messages of self-loathing, self-denial, and rule by the priesthood. The differences between religion and politics are superficial and cosmetic. It's all just politics.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Bull feces. You obviously know nothing about islam if you can make these claims. Feel free to continue displaying your ignorance. The rest of us will enjoy the comic relief of reading such trash from someone who simply remains clueless.

        Delete
    7. There is a certain eloquence in blunt, frank speak, at least to me.

      Just think of one of the most eloquent refusals of surrender ever made by modern man. "Nuts." Says it all. Speaks volumes in emotion and factual statement.

      "Losers" is a word that the normal person can understand. And one that burns the souls and minds of the bad guys.

      Trump doesn't say 30 words where one works, unlike some previous administration we all know about. And he means it, unlike some previous administration we all know about.

      I mean, you can use all sorts of allegorical statements and scientific mumbo jumbo to talk about that patch of black mold that you find in your house, or you can just say "Black Mold" and everyone understands that you have a problem that can kill you and you need to take care of it right away.

      And, really, the word "losers" is probably the most polite word he could have used. Me, I have a potty mouth and like to use curse words like they are some version of free verse poetry.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. Losers is sort of OK, but it really isn't accurate. It normally denotes someone who fails to be successful at anything they try. muslims (I never capitalize anything to do with islam because that would show them respect they don't deserve) are successful at killing. The scum murderers who identify as isis are the perfect expression of islam. They have been very successful at killing non-muslims (mostly Christians and Kurds), and at performing terrorist acts throughout Europe and Israel, as well as here in America.

        I understand that Trump can't call them murderous scum without causing every muslim-loving liberal to flame out and have a hissy-fit, but that is what they really are. Perverted followers of a barbarian child rapist who was clever enough to get a lot of other perverted Arab desert scum to join his banner. Liberal share a delight in a lot of islam's perversions (like pedophilia), so they support and defend islam even while muslims are killing Americans, Brits, the French, Israelis, etc.

        "Murderous perverted filth" nails it for me.

        Delete
    8. "There is plenty of bad behavior by Christians. The Spanish Inquisition. Genocide of American Indians."

      There was no "genocide" of American Indians. Almost all of the fighting was a handful of Indians against a handful of immigrants or vice versa. There were a few military battles but even then the losses were low on both sides. In the entirety of the fight between the immigrants and the Indians arguably the Indians killed more immigrants than vice versa. There simply was no genocide but rather a long 400 year) history of small fights between the two factions.

      ReplyDelete
    9. It was only the indigenes' somewhat limited immune systems stemming from the quite low numbers of founders that permitted their conquest by Europeans. Accidental mass deaths from Old World epidemic diseases that knocked off up to 90% of population in 1500's.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. It isn't "exactly" accurate to quote that often quoted point that the Indians had no immunity to diseases brought over from Europe. Those diseases did indeed kill a lot of Indians and in some cases entire tribes of Indians. But there was no "inherent" immune resistance in the Europeans. In fact the immigrants lost more of their population to these disease than the Indians did. About half of all children born until around 1900 died before age 18 from these diseases.

        What made the difference for the Indians was that in a lot of cases adult white immigrants had already been exposed to these diseases and were survivors. So when their children got sick there were still adults around who did not get sick who could provide some care for them. In tha case of the Indians typically the entire tribe or group would get sick at one time and surviving was more difficult with no one to get and prepare food or bring water etc.

        So while the "immune system" point isn't exactly true; that is the immune system of a new born Indian or immigrant was the same. Neither one had any resistance to these diseases.

        Delete
    10. It is apparent that the propaganda wing of the muzzle murderers is busy trying to muddy the waters and hide the truth about their savagery. The "anonymous" idiot spewing garbage here is one. Kenny "Wirecutter" Lane has had one pissing all over his blog and several other bloggers are being afflicted by these enablers suffering from delusional verbal diarrhea.

      ReplyDelete
      Replies
      1. For sure, Dan. I figured "troll" and one of the first laws of the Internet is "don't feed the trolls". Just ignore.

        Troll, muslim apologist, diversity cheerleader, or idiot, in no particular order, the answer is the same.

        Delete